Thursday, December 30, 2004
I had to laugh about how after she was fitted for a surprisingly well fitting bra, she exclaims "but by God, those suckers stayed in place!", because what are they if not, well, "Suckers"?
Tuesday, December 28, 2004
What is it? This costume and playset promises to allow a child to "run like Dash," the youngest son of the Incredibles family who possesses supernatural speed.
Why it's dangerous: The anabolic steroids included with the playset were difficult to administer, as the younger toddlers shied away from the needles. The amphetamines made the children jittery, and while they did increase their footspeed noticably, it was difficult to get them running in any one direction and even more difficult to get them to effectively fight crime.
The costume's black mask can also obscure vision somewhat.
What you should do: Let the children keep the costume, but stay away from the speed enhancement. Remember that great toys rely on imagination first and foremost. National Lampoon enjoyed the most success in getting the children to "run like Dash" simply by taking them to the park and having one of our staff chase them while wearing the costume of the predatory arch nemesis of the Incredibles, Captain Molestro.
Friday, December 24, 2004
Nine out of Ten Would be Adequate
Researchers at Alabama's Auburn University say they have determined what men want in the "ideal woman": she is sexually inexperienced but likes sex, has a career but is a full-time homemaker, has a slim build, is athletic, and has pretty eyes, dark hair, good complexion and a firm butt. Large breasts are nice, but not all that important. The study's lead author, Erica Gannon, says the specifications are similar to what is found in the Bible. "Our participants, whether knowingly or unknowingly, espouse a view of the ideal woman that is very similar to the views held by individuals thousands of years ago." However, she adds, "It's hard to be this woman." (UPI) ...About as hard as being the ideal man: strong yet gentle, powerful yet sensitive, has a great career yet helps clean the house and raise the children, in control yet cries, and a sex expert who's only been with one woman.
The large gulf in the lower part of the continent is the Great Australian Bite. Notice the similarity?
And then there are the dogs who are waiting ever so patiently for a few scraps,... which I can never deny.
Thursday, December 23, 2004
Great photo article here on scary santa visits.
Which reminds me, I saw the movie "Bad Santa" the other day and was presently surprised at their take on a trite story of the evil-guy-turning-good. But this was more to do with the really raunchy dialogue.
Wednesday, December 22, 2004
- Some people said that polls themselves were part of the problem. Charlie Eubanks, a cotton farmer and lawyer from the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas, said he supported President Bush but had been lukewarm about going to war. Now, he said there was no choice but to fight on, and that reports on opinion polls were only "aiding and abetting" the enemy by making opponents think the American will is weak.[emphasis, mine]
The opinions on the late ferocity of attacks however is mixed. This one reminds me of the end of the German resistance in 1944 when young Hitler youths were disregarding the signs and wreaking havoc against allied forces as they moved eastwards. They were fervent and desperate.
- "It tells me that they are worried that they are going to lose," said Mr. Mayo, of Newcastle, Colo. "They are just trying to make it as painful as possible and they don't care how they do it."
But the news reports have you thinking another way. And its very worrying.
- 'Another military veteran who has become active in opposing the war said the message of Tuesday's attack was not desperation, but greater organization by the insurgents.'
Should we consider that something like 15 of the 18 districts in Iraq (not sure numbers here) are peaceful, as positive, promising, etc? Or should we think that this is forever getting worse and the allied forces are losing?
But one mother expreses her feelings like this : "It's like watching your son playing in traffic, and there's nothing you can do," Ms. Bellows said. "You can't reach him."
By the way, have you seen this campaign called My Soldier? It seems a bit strange to me that I could write to some 20 year-old guy from, for example the religious south, and in some way make him feel better. But I figure I got to do it.
Moore is getting lunatic fringed, lately. A shame. Its weird how my views on Moore get me stuck in the middle, where both sides of the spectrum can hate me.
Bowling for Columbine had (in my worthless opinion) a valid point about the bizarre American Gun compulsion. An yet, I think his view on Bush was perhaps unfair. As in the Pres. is already sticky fly paper for anti-isolationists criticism, anti-globalization rancor, elitist liberal ravings, and the tried and oft-true caricatures. But when strong, war-time measures infringe on rights, everyone many say we are spiraling into fascism. They seem to ignore what sort of system is really in place. The USA is much more free on these issues than, for example France. Id checks, wire tapping, search and seizure rules. Miranda? I am not certain, but I think this must be joke there. (France is somehow especially odd since their view on Iraq and how little Bush traveled there and other weak-on-rights countries; this travelling and awareness of the world seemed a bonus for Kerry, for example.) And France had not even had a huge terrorist act. Imagine what it could be like if they did.
Perhaps I should explain my view these things sometimes. I will call it my 'Dan's political dogma'. I am fervently anti-gun, ambivalent on pro-choice, I have to admit, a hawk, and think the religious right is an embarrassment. But what gets me is that the liberal elite seems to ignore the fact that the country is full of people who are religious and are carrying guns. The people have the right to express their opinion and vote even though the election system is prone to makeup, spins, and talk-show-host-appearance presidents. That's the people's choice, for crying out loud. We, (yes, I am a fellow American) are ridiculous because of our similarity to the countries we criticize like Iran (religion, guns). That's us, so face up to it. Don't say these wheat belt, fundamentalists are 'wrong', but say 'I have a different opinion'. Because they outnumber you irregardless of whether they are right or wrong. If you still really believe they are stupid, take a look at the ill-informed world over the course of history. It had problems. Main tenets being: 1. big powers fighting over property, 2. what the people hear is rarely the real reason, 3. information and education and an awareness of the world is 'spun' too much for anyone of the masses to ever have the mythologically unbiased opinoin, and 4. large percentages of the population die from war and disease. This - in my small opinion - has always been true, and will always be true. (And note tenet 4., the percentages will always be the same!) There is no noble savage; it really is a matter of fight over stuff or not getting it. Sorry. Really, I am sorry. There is no other explanation.
But I do hope that we can be told to 'be good'. And yes, doing good feels good. And respecting people to continue being good should be supported. But don't expect they are going to be this way or can always be this way. That is a mistake. Wow. What a tirade.
Tuesday, December 21, 2004
Here is a question for you: If the US led a force of UN soldiers into this conflict, do you honestly think they would have come away without mass protests around the world? Do you think that the situation would have been cleared up within two years? And even abuse stories of US servicemen?
Do you think that we could have pulled out with some sense of stability? I think not.
But I put to you, was it better to stand by and do nothing?
- 'In Rwanda, the United States did not simply not intervene. It also used its considerable power to discourage other Western powers from intervening. '
To ignore the situation - rather than getting into a very messy military situation - was the choice of Clinton's administration.
- 'Mr. Lake readily acknowledged other unattractive features of American policy: that the State Department prohibited use of the word "genocide" for months, that the Pentagon refused to jam Rwandan broadcasts that guided the killing and that there had been warnings well ahead of time, including one from the Central Intelligence Agency, that a catastrophic human disaster was in the making.
- "It was based on the belief that if you used the word, then you're required to take action," he said. "They didn't go the sophistry route - using the word and finding a way to weasel out of it. Now in Sudan, we've used it and we're wriggling out of its meaning. Which is more unattractive? I don't know."'
What pisses me off is that so many people want this to stop and yet when the US goes in, the scandals start. And the same sorts of people are telling the US that they really screwed up.
Sure it is in vogue to ignore the thousands of people killed by Saddam and the previous issue of making WMD, in favor of the intelligence failure and the perceived fraudulent push by Bush to get a war started with a fabricated link to Al Q. But when a Rwanda and Bosnia started, the US and the UN drag their feet in favor of slow negotiation. In both cases Clinton chose to remain on the sidelines.
And when something gets started, too many say that force is not the only answer. Okay, how would you stop a Rawanda-like situation without giving a UN soldier bullets?
This really gets me angry and is where I get apoplectic with the left.
I remember this guy like I recall Starsky and Hutch, Angie Dickenson, Kojak, Mannix, etc. Something to watch when nothing else was on. (Okay, I actually looked forward to Starsky and Hutch).
And the last time I saw Robert Blake was in David Lynch's "Lost Highway", and I thought it was so cool that he would go from, well, trailer-trash TV, to a cool, cultishy movie like Lost Highway. [Interesting trivia from IMDB.com "Robert Blake told director Lynch he was not going to give him a hard time about the script because Blake did not understand it. Blake also said he felt his character was the Devil."]
Well, go figure. Now he does what he always was advising against. What was the line? "If you can't do the time, don't do the crime". I am surprised the stories about him don't quote that over and over again. I haven't seen any, at least.
Monday, December 20, 2004
I also framed some of my comments to reflect the fact that I am 45 and don't (can't) hang out much with the younger crowd. But I also wrote:
- Oh, there are a lot of young Americans here and a bit of arrogance is the best way to be left out. Many of them are well-travelled and well, basically all of us have 'heard-it-all-before'. Just warning you that people who have been here a long time hate listening to the newcomers stories. Best to sit back and listen, and avoid 'where are you from, how long you been here' opening lines. Asking questions for help etc, is fine. Hope you don't mind my being frank.
Am I right? Don't we get a bit like the WWII soldier that didn't want to know the name of the new replacement? Or don't we get sick of the guy that has "lived all over the place" seems to know it all because he lived in LA and NY and maybe had a summer job at the Village Voice?Kind of a wierd feeling being in a place and getting all the referrals from family and friends to help out one of their friends. Hell, I would probably like the same. But doesn't anyone else feel like a cynic?
I will help him, now that I feel guilty (and he probably figured out the link to the blog). I also told him:
- Take it easy and enjoy the ride. Its a great place to live and a lot of fun. When you get here it might seem dark and dank, but January is a slow month in paradise.
Sunday, December 19, 2004
when kids get pyschological scars they will carry forever.
On December 6th every year in towns and cities around the Czech Republic, families will take their kids out to enjoy the Mikulas celebration. (yes, Mikulas like St Nicholas, but don't ask me how that works).
The setting is this: A father like figure, with white beard, bishop-like hat (miter?) and a shepherd's staff.
An angel (I don't get where this guy comes in, but probably to counter the devil).
A devil, darkened face, curly wig with horns, a hanging chain, and only one shoe. Job description: to tell the little kid to do better at school, stop punching his sister...to scare the kid so that if he doesn't clean up his act, he will be joining the devil in Hell.
I have heard of one kid that was crying for three days and working so hard to learn how to tie his shoelaces. Or else, that's it, Shazam! He's taken from his mother and father and will spend the rest of his eternity (a concept they know means a long time) with the devil.
And why do the Mikulas, the angel and the devil partake of this festival? For tips from parents. A way of paying for the extra muscle when the kids are not behaving or accomplishng the shoelace tying.
The funniest part is seeing the hungover Mikulas', angels and devils at around 6 in the morning the next day after they spent all their drinking money. What you thought it was just for fun?
This kid is crying.
Dunno if this devil would scare anyone.
Devils calling for backup.
Saturday, December 18, 2004
Tuesday, December 14, 2004
Monday, December 13, 2004
The guy who thought of this web address was really thinking. I was curious how PayPal works so I googled the one word, Paypal. The first hit was the PayPal site. The second? PayPalSucks. (Eyes go boing!) Of course I opened the link and had a really good read.
And perhaps even more interesting is that when you hit hit "blog this", not only does the simple link for the address appear like this, www.blahblah.com but as much hatred is included as possible to appear like this: PayPalSucks.com is where you will learn about the paypal class action lawsuit, abuse, fraud, & evil behind the PayPal system!
Here is a NYTimes article on the use of deception and what goes out to the public. Are they decieving for a military end? A public relations end? Or is it a military use that is accused of being a PR use.
One general sums it up: "Are we trying to inform? Yes.
Do we offer perspective? Yes.
Do we offer military judgment? Yes.
Must we tell the truth to stay credible? Yes.
Is there a battlefield value in deceiving the enemy? Yes.
Do we intentionally deceive the American people? No." - General Kimmitt
"In the battle of perception management, where the enemy is clearly using the media to help manage perceptions of the general public, our job is not perception management but to counter the enemy's perception management," said the chief Pentagon spokesman, Lawrence Di Rita.
Sure this could be abused, but I am still glad they use this skill to avoid taking casualties.
Friday, December 10, 2004
In an article last week on CNN there was a story of how the US military wanted to see what happens when an attack is advertised, but not carried out. Namely the false attack on Fallujah that was announced 3 weeks before the real one.
I am sure the public will cry foul in the UK about censorship, the right of the people to know. Or, that if the west accuses Al Jezeerah about biased reporting or being a tool of the insurgents, then the west, too, will show some obvious weaknesses.
In the case of the tool, I have no problem fooling the media. What!? Abusing trust? Carelessly undermining the truth? Martial law and propagandizing the media?
If it saves lives, I cannot deny it would be paramount in the minds of the mothers-of-soldiers, at home. Sorry, I realize its a complex issue. But given the chance to chose on this one, I would have to stick to it.
I am surprised that no one used this opportunity to dress up those microphones with some Christmas tinsel.
Thursday, December 09, 2004
Actually as a 'dude'-user, I thought it was kind of cute how he spent time recording frat brothers and asked them to make notes. How funny is that. ("like dude, we got to write more about this but I just spilled beer on my notes. Like wow, dude I just used 'dude' once more! Oh no, two times, dude, I mean three dude!", and so on and so forth).
What I found more interesting was how I would compare the word 'dude' to the word 'mate' as used in Australia. While the origin is different, the use of mate would cover all the colloquial uses of dude and much, much more.
And here "9 in 10 survive"we see that the medics in Iraq are saving the lives for 9 out of ten wounded in Iraq, which is unprecedented. Compared to Vietnam which was one in 4, for example.
But the "9 in 10 survive" they put the credit on the medics but also on the use of Kevlar body armor and helmets.
Me thinks that future laptops will be kevlar. (My idea, go ahead and copy it, like all the other billion dollar ideas I have realeased into the atmosphere!)
Think about it, solders might even carry the laptop on their chest and it may stop the bullet better than the preverbial coat pocket bible. Or the only one to survive the mailman-like massacre at the local dairy quee were those who grabbed their laptops as they dove under the table. (Sadly the laptops probably won't be milkshake resistant).
Monday, December 06, 2004
Man, I can't stay awake today.Got up at five and went for a short run with dogs (have to walk them that early anyway and now I am trying get healthy again).
I suffered many "bad-breath" tram rides today (meaning that all the trams were just crowded enough so that I had to breathe someones bad-breath for a few minutes before I could squirm away from it; alas, sometimes I couldn't always squirm away from it).
Got to work at 7:10
( Trip : Prague 7 to Prague 10, 30 min, one bad-breath tram) to do my morning note to brokers so that i could leave at 7.40 to go to an important business-achieving meeting.
Left work at 7:40
( Trip: Prague 10 to Prague 5, 32min, two bad-breath trams)
Got there and this guy wasn't there. His colleague said, he is sick (read: overslept), and „we hope we can meet later“.
So I came back to work.
( Trip : Prague 5 to Prague 10, 25 min, two bad-breath metros)
Boring and tired all day. And now I have to meet him at 5pm.
My most exciting decision of the day is whether to take the two bad-breath trams back to Prague 5, or the two bad-breath metros; followed by the one bad-breath tram back to Prague 7.
8 tram rides
More than 8 smelly, bad-breath mouths to avoid.
One case of flu or other similar air-borne illness.
Saturday, December 04, 2004
But you got to wonder, after two decades out there with the Prairie dogs, maybe this guy is imagining they are talking about prairie dog politics and soap operas.
Of course this has a good chance of being a hoax.
Friday, December 03, 2004
I was just watching a professor from Rutgers named Motyl speak about the Ukrainian "crisis" ("Crisis" being the CNN word for "we hope there will be shooting").
This guy was so optimistic it was laughable. He says that Yuschenko will win by a landslide, and then the Europeans and the IMF will come to make things so much better (wish I could remember his exact fairy tale words).
Come on bud? You live in Jersey and you are that Optimistic? Take a look at Serbia and the replacing of Milosevic. (And don't give me that bull that we Ukrainians are not like the Serbians - something that all eastern European countries like to claim when in fact these sort of issues are almost freakishly like some photocopied plotline). Serbia is going through the massive every-tooth-a-wisdom-tooth teething pains due to IMF demands and Serbian Nationalistic sidestepping, for example.
Ukraine has what, 50 or 60 million people (10 times Serbia) and a smoky eastern region that is full of Russian wannabees. Landslide? Perhaps, but there will be huge problems. This bailout could ruin the IMF. I would tell them to stay away.
But, alas, the vultures will circle, the USAID jerks will come in with their Chief of Parties and funny named neologistic plans. Huge fees will be made and the eastern worker will go back to his vodka and dream of the days with guaranteed housing and work.
Corruption? It will remain, no one should ever wish it will go away. Better not to expect too much. When I lived in Ukraine there was always the arrogant cops and ubiquitous mafia. I have not been for 5 years but it is reportedly much better... in Kiev and Lvov or (Lviv? I forget which is more politically correct). But these major cities are in the focus and have the pro-west demostrators. Go the heartland, bub.
Today Russian is the language of choice. Many people don't realize its only the western third that really speaks Ukrainian day to day.
They have it very, very tough there. And its a huge place that the BBC and CNN don't go to much. Sure, there is no Rwandan type massacre and no accessible terrorists. But it is a study in human misery, with a very tough people.
This guy is already working on a project to extend life. Read this.
"you would be youthful, both physically and mentally, right up to the day you mis-time the speed of that oncoming lorry."
I actually think last year he was drinking Rogaine and it took to his chin.
I reckon the biggest problem with this particular issue is BAD MARKETING !
I mean really, the backers of this commercial AND the creators should have used a softer approach and sneaked the add by the censor geeks and perhaps shown, to use the given bouncers-at-the-door example, two guys not holding hands, but maybe standing next to another much discriminated group member (MDGM), as they all get rejected while the waspy types cruise on in.
At this point one of the guys (not holding hands) just sort of hurrumphs and flips his head back in a typically flaming annoyed action. I figure the censors would have thought the MDGM was the point. Later, they could have slowly moved into more and more flaming commercials. Sorry I am not being PC, but my point is to I am a bit angry that they didn't get these adds aired. I support the idea of equal access and rebel against all sorts of arrogance and discrimination (although I am not totally supporting a mythologically based idea called religion).
One thing confuses me. After all the junk about the networks being accused of liberal bias, this comes along and everyone thinks that the "other side" has won out in some sort of semi-constitutionally backed pogrom against gays and in support of the religious right.
My point is this: there was only a liberal bias because the networks, cable and free-to-air, realized that kerry was going to lose and wanted the public to think it was a close race - for them to sell more adds/win more market share. It was clear from the start that the incumbent would win. The TV bonkins said, "hell, that won't sell well. Lets favor the underdog, and make a big to-do about the left getting out to vote!" Silly games, but this church thing sort of makes the point.
Thursday, December 02, 2004
Not a bad offer for a Brit with a 115,000 quid and some time off (Forever?). Especially someone looking for a change of venue -with nice looking girls. Having a pub in a beautiful city isn't a bad way of life.
Hackers turn to cell phones - November 26, 2004 A mobile phone virus! What will they think of next?
"Like a sneeze in a crowded room"
It spread through Bluetooth, a feature on some phones normally used to synchronize phones and computers. It sends wireless signals up to 30 feet, so calendar and contact information can be updated without hooking devices together with a wire. But Cabir hijacked that function, sending Bluetooth phones on a search-and-destroy mission to infect other Bluetooth phones, spreading the virus like a sneeze in a crowded room.
Wednesday, December 01, 2004
An unknown-to-me and serious looking colleague was lurking around the desk today closely looking at the movements in Unipetrol and Cesky Tel so I asked one of my desk operators who he was. Turns out he is the guy who monitors positions and money for our margin punters.
I said that I thought he was one of the asset managers.
And my desk mate says, no, just watching the market closely."But sometimes he gives us some very good orders," he says with a smirk. Ha!
(For the uninformed: There is nothing like a joke about closing out one of our speculators on a margin call.)